I've long seen Chomsky as controlled opposition serving Jewish supremacism in America. So are Amy Goodman and Max Blumenthal, among many others. This is not to say that they are playing this role consciously, though this is possible. But we should not underestimate the Jewish capacity for self-deception.
It should be noted that Norman Finkelstein, who after the fall of Chomsky (and to his credit rejection of both Epstein and Dershowitz in private emails) is the go to example of the Pro-Palestine "good Jew" is ALSO against BDS. Furthermore for most of his career was a two state solution guy. Now his stance is "I don’t support two states. Actually, I don’t support one state. I support no states" AKA retard Anarchism, fully taking over Chomsky's "lead them to a dead end" role
Yep, Finkelstein is another limited hangout. He just hangs out a little farther than most.
Jews who sympathize with Palestinians are in a difficult position. The question is how far to take their opposition to Zionism. If they went full-on pro-Palestinian this would mean advocating that the Zionist project be cancelled and the Palestinians allowed to retake their country and expel or subordinate the remaining Jews. Only this would satisfy a true Palestinian nationalist. Few Jews would be willing to go that far.
The only way a Jew could totally reject Zionism and remain a loyal Jew would be to argue that only territorial civic polities should exist anywhere, or perhaps a borderless global polity, in which anyone could be a citizen. In other words, to reject ethno-nationalism for Jews as well as for the goyim. A one-state solution for Palestine could take this form. But true Palestinian nationalists would not be willing to settle for this, at least not unless they were sure to be the overwhelming majority and to remain in secure control of state and civil society (i.e. not allow Jews to gain control from within as they have done in the US and UK).
The language his wife used in her "apology" response is very interesting. It's a combination of victim vocabulary mixed with unconvincing ignorance of who Epstein was/is.
I don't get it. Is it a crime to have a friend accused of crimes? I'm not clear on the moral imperative anywhere in my conscience to not have contact with a friend accused of a crime, regardless of which
“They can both objectively be seen in public only delighted by humanity.” Pardon?
Hitler and Epstein were managers. What and who did Epstein manage and to what purpose? Kompromat? And who was compromised and for what purpose? Do you believe the elites are corrupt?
I think I was wrong about Chomsky's role as an intellectual of standing. Propaganda even on its subtle level can work! And that's something I thought I was good at...
I will add, just for random color, that I too had some Jewish ancestry, though I never adopted any of it. I too, lived in a Kibbutz in the 60’s, as a way out of some difficulties in the States.
But I didn’t enjoy Kibbutz life, and I detested the people running the place. All they cared about was recruiting me in their wars. They said “We have a right to defend ourselves!” And I said: “You wouldn’t need to defend yourselves if you behaved like decent people.” I still feel that way, and I never went back.
Way back in time I had a girlfriend who told me that she was going to live for a year at Kibbutz in Israel, when she came back she told me some of the things that you experienced Sera and it was very similar to your story while she was living there. And it wasn't at all to her liking. I must say that kinda surprised me...
I've long seen Chomsky as controlled opposition serving Jewish supremacism in America. So are Amy Goodman and Max Blumenthal, among many others. This is not to say that they are playing this role consciously, though this is possible. But we should not underestimate the Jewish capacity for self-deception.
It should be noted that Norman Finkelstein, who after the fall of Chomsky (and to his credit rejection of both Epstein and Dershowitz in private emails) is the go to example of the Pro-Palestine "good Jew" is ALSO against BDS. Furthermore for most of his career was a two state solution guy. Now his stance is "I don’t support two states. Actually, I don’t support one state. I support no states" AKA retard Anarchism, fully taking over Chomsky's "lead them to a dead end" role
Yep, Finkelstein is another limited hangout. He just hangs out a little farther than most.
Jews who sympathize with Palestinians are in a difficult position. The question is how far to take their opposition to Zionism. If they went full-on pro-Palestinian this would mean advocating that the Zionist project be cancelled and the Palestinians allowed to retake their country and expel or subordinate the remaining Jews. Only this would satisfy a true Palestinian nationalist. Few Jews would be willing to go that far.
The only way a Jew could totally reject Zionism and remain a loyal Jew would be to argue that only territorial civic polities should exist anywhere, or perhaps a borderless global polity, in which anyone could be a citizen. In other words, to reject ethno-nationalism for Jews as well as for the goyim. A one-state solution for Palestine could take this form. But true Palestinian nationalists would not be willing to settle for this, at least not unless they were sure to be the overwhelming majority and to remain in secure control of state and civil society (i.e. not allow Jews to gain control from within as they have done in the US and UK).
Great piece. Thanks.
The language his wife used in her "apology" response is very interesting. It's a combination of victim vocabulary mixed with unconvincing ignorance of who Epstein was/is.
Excellent and timely cult-busting. Chomsky’s support for the covid party line was also a major clue to who he really was.
He looks like a trans man in that pic.
You should read this article by Roman Dmowski, he desribed this problem long time ago: https://paulszymanski.substack.com/p/the-traveling-salesman-in-trouble?r=1lnrkn
Sick, with friends like Epstein, who needs friends?
Great read. Thanks
Bravo, yet again!
I don't get it. Is it a crime to have a friend accused of crimes? I'm not clear on the moral imperative anywhere in my conscience to not have contact with a friend accused of a crime, regardless of which
Judge a man by the company he keeps (and his tribal loyalties).
One isn't company. Two or more
Chomski + Epstein = 2. Two’s company, three’s a crowd.
You're retarded. Hitler didn't kill anyone. Epstein didn't rape anyone. They can both objectively be seen in public only delighted by humanity
“They can both objectively be seen in public only delighted by humanity.” Pardon?
Hitler and Epstein were managers. What and who did Epstein manage and to what purpose? Kompromat? And who was compromised and for what purpose? Do you believe the elites are corrupt?
Elites are corrupt. Managers too. Except these 2
Yes there is a moral imperative not to hang out with a friend convicted (not just accused) of child sex trafficking
I think I was wrong about Chomsky's role as an intellectual of standing. Propaganda even on its subtle level can work! And that's something I thought I was good at...
I will add, just for random color, that I too had some Jewish ancestry, though I never adopted any of it. I too, lived in a Kibbutz in the 60’s, as a way out of some difficulties in the States.
But I didn’t enjoy Kibbutz life, and I detested the people running the place. All they cared about was recruiting me in their wars. They said “We have a right to defend ourselves!” And I said: “You wouldn’t need to defend yourselves if you behaved like decent people.” I still feel that way, and I never went back.
You were wrong about your method of analysis, your absolute idiot
Way back in time I had a girlfriend who told me that she was going to live for a year at Kibbutz in Israel, when she came back she told me some of the things that you experienced Sera and it was very similar to your story while she was living there. And it wasn't at all to her liking. I must say that kinda surprised me...